home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- RELIGION, Page 76The Canterbury Trail
-
-
- An enfeebled Church of England awaits a new leader
-
-
- Kremlin atheists quietly supervise the selection of Moscow's
- Russian Orthodox Patriarchs. Turkey's government leaders,
- though Muslims, are said to weigh in when Ecumenical Patriarchs
- are chosen. But imagine Italy's Prime Minister appointing a
- Pope, or President Bush picking the Presiding Bishop of his
- Episcopal Church. Just such a church-state mesh will occur in
- Britain in the coming months as Prime Minister Margaret
- Thatcher prepares to choose the next Archbishop of Canterbury,
- head of the Church of England and spiritual leader of some 70
- million Anglicans and Episcopalians worldwide.
-
- The process began last week when Robert Runcie announced
- that he will step down next January, eight months shy of
- mandatory retirement at age 70. Like all English bishops, his
- successor will be named by the Prime Minister and formally
- appointed by the Queen. Thatcher, raised as a Methodist, is
- probably not sorry to see Runcie go: she has been vexed by his
- pleas for the suffering poor under her economic policies and
- doubtless agrees with Peterborough's Bishop William Westwood
- that "the church needs to take a less high profile" under its
- next leader.
-
- Following a procedure revised in 1977, candidates for the
- post will be selected by a panel of bishops, priests and lay
- people chosen by the church, with a Thatcher appointee in
- charge. The panel will propose two names to the Prime Minister
- in order of preference. She gains further leverage through her
- power to reject both names and demand new ones, although such
- a move would be extraordinary.
-
- Runcie, named in 1980, is universally admired as a man. But
- as a church leader he is faulted by both liberals and
- traditionalists for chronic indecision. Runcie's defenders say
- his cautious style helped work a miracle or two in preventing
- world Anglicanism from flying apart over women priests and
- bishops. Yet the compromises he engineered merely paper over
- the fact that the Anglican Communion is barely a Communion any
- longer. Some of its 27 autonomous national branches --
- including the U.S. Episcopal Church -- ordain women priests,
- who are not recognized by Runcie's mother church and other
- branches. Non recognition of priests (male and female) ordained
- by women bishops will further muddy the waters.
-
- Meanwhile, the Church of England is fast fading as any kind
- of force in the nation's life. The church's regular worshipers
- constitute a paltry 2.4% of the population. Only 29% of
- England's babies are baptized as Anglicans. The decline had set
- in long before Runcie's reign, but he proved powerless to stop
- it. With England becoming a mission field, the future may lie
- with the Evangelical wing, which runs some thriving parishes
- and is gaining the majority among priests.
-
- Though speculation abounds over the wide field of potential
- successors, no clear front runners have yet emerged. The grim
- truth about the job may be, in the words of Archdeacon George
- Austin of York, that "no one wants it. It's too awful. I have
- often seen Robert Runcie gray with exhaustion." The Runcie
- decade was one of the most contentious ever, and his successor
- will confront the same passionate left-right disputes -- not
- only over women clergy but homosexuality, remarriage after
- divorce, modernization of The Book of Common Prayer, and
- assaults upon belief in Christ's virgin birth and bodily
- resurrection. Whoever gets the nod, said an editorial in
- London's Daily Telegraph, the prospect of change at Canterbury
- is bound to inaugurate the Church of England's "most serious
- debate on the future" since King Henry VIII broke from Rome in
- 1534.
-
-
- By Richard N. Ostling. Reported by Helen Gibson/London.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-